Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global white extermination
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Agree with Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth - there are BLP concerns, so a speedy delete is justifiable. Incidentally, the other similar articles could probably be speedied as well. PhilKnight (talk) 19:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Global white extermination (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unencyclopedic article promoting an extremist ideology. Beagel (talk) 17:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Incidentally, I've WP:PRODded the Revolutionary Black Panther Party party. Will AfD it if it is declined. -Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 17:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Quite right too. That was a nasty little walled garden of complete bollocks they were trying to make. It is not clear to me whether the author is promoting this group/ideology or seeking to defame the group by attributing extreme ideology to them. It doesn't really matter. Either way, it has to go.--DanielRigal (talk) 17:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I also prodded Divine Race War, Alli Muhammad, and Revolutionary Black Panther Party 10 Point Manual. -Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 17:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Quite right too. That was a nasty little walled garden of complete bollocks they were trying to make. It is not clear to me whether the author is promoting this group/ideology or seeking to defame the group by attributing extreme ideology to them. It doesn't really matter. Either way, it has to go.--DanielRigal (talk) 17:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete: Unreferenced. No indication of extent of notability. If it can be substantiated with references then it goes in the existing articles. If it can't then it is probably defamatory of a possibly still living person. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom. I've also added a notification about this user here. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 18:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Doesn't get any non-wiki Google hits. Hut 8.5 20:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Perhaps we should move the article to the title Dr. Alli Muhammad is a BAD man (although perhaps we can persuade him to channel his ambitions toward more positive goals). Or perhaps we should have an article about green sky? I've heard several people say that it would be cool if the sky was green, and it can be done if we try hard enough. Mandsford (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete = The article is unreferenced and the related articles about the Revolutionary Black Panther Party and its beliefs claim an extremely racist and violent philosophy. This needs to be deleted immediately as an unreferenced negative BLP, as do the related articles. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 19:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.